
多通道功能性电刺激四肢联动对偏瘫后肩关节半脱位患者的康复疗效
Rehabilitation efficacy of multichannel FES limb linkage on patients with shoulder subluxation after hemiplegia
目的:观察运用多通道功能性电刺激四肢联动治疗偏瘫后肩关节半脱位患者的康复疗效。方法:将60例偏瘫后肩关节半脱位患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,各30例。对照组给予日常康复治疗和普通四肢联动训练;治疗组在日常康复治疗的同时辅以多通道功能性电刺激四肢联动。治疗4周后,采用肩峰与肱骨头间距(AHI)评定肩关节半脱位改善程度;用简化Fugl-Meyer上肢运动功能量表(FMA-UE)、改良Barthel指数(MBI)等评估肩关节功能恢复情况;比较两组治疗显效率。结果:治疗后,治疗组AHI值低于对照组;FMA-UE、MBI评分和显效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在日常康复治疗的基础上,运用多通道功能性电刺激四肢联动可改善患者肩关节半脱位症状,提高患者上肢活动能力。
Objective: To observe the rehabilitation efficacy of multichannel functional electrical stimulation (FES) combined with four limbs on patients with shoulder subluxation after hemiplegia. Methods: Sixty patients with shoulder subluxation after hemiplegia were randomly divided into a control group and a treatment group with 30 cases each. The control group was given daily rehabilitation treatment and general limb linkage training, while the treatment group was supplemented with multichannel FES limb linkage on the basis of daily rehabilitation treatment. The degree of the improvement of shoulder subluxation was assessed by the acromiohumeral interval (AHI), the recovery of shoulder function was assessed by the simplified Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremities (FMA-UE) and the modified Barthel index (MBI), and the significant efficacy rate was compared between the two groups four weeks after treatment. Results: After treatment, the AHI value was lower, and the FMA-UE and MBI scores and the significant efficacy rate were higher in the treatment group than the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Multichannel FES limb linkage can improve shoulder subluxation and upper limb mobility of patients on the basis of daily rehabilitation treatment.
功能性电刺激 / 四肢联动 / 肩关节半脱位 / 偏瘫 {{custom_keyword}} /
FES / limb linkage / shoulder subluxation / hemiplegia {{custom_keyword}} /
表1 治疗前后AHI值、FMA-UE及MBI评分比较($\bar{x}±s$) |
组别 | AHI/mm | FMA-UE | MBI | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | |||
治疗组(n=30) | 21.53±2.27 | 15.00±1.72a) | 7.10±2.34 | 33.53±5.51a) | 12.17±4.29 | 48.33±9.41a) | ||
对照组(n=30) | 21.60±2.06 | 18.10±2.04a) | 6.93±2.41 | 27.53±5.96a) | 11.83±5.00 | 38.33±9.85a) | ||
t值 | -0.119 | -6.360 | 0.272 | 4.048 | 0.277 | 4.020 | ||
P值 | 0.906 | <0.001 | 0.787 | <0.001 | 0.783 | <0.001 |
注:a) 与治疗前相比,P<0.001。 |
表2 临床疗效比较[n(%)] |
组别 | 显效 | 有效 | 无效 |
---|---|---|---|
治疗组(n=30) | 11(36.6) | 19(63.3) | 0 |
对照组(n=30) | 1(3.3) | 27(90.0) | 2(6.7) |
χ2值 | 11.725 | ||
P值 | 0.003 |
[1] |
王亚楠, 吴思缈, 刘鸣. 中国脑卒中15年变化趋势和特点[J]. 华西医学, 2021, 36(6): 803-807.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
席建明, 王慧灵, 李瑞青, 等. 神经肌肉关节促进技术联合浮针治疗脑卒中后肩关节半脱位伴肩痛的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2021, 43(5): 401-405.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
陈培荣, 李奎, 吴丹丽, 等. 多通路功能性电刺激四肢联动对于脑卒中患者下肢功能恢复的影响[J]. 中国康复, 2017, 32(6): 476-478.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
郑修元, 林阳阳, 燕铁斌, 等. 经皮神经电刺激与功能性电刺激对脑卒中患者肩关节半脱位的即刻影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(11): 1168-1170.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
刘加鹏, 王卫宁, 梁思捷, 等. 多通道功能性电刺激踏车训练对脑卒中患者步行功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2021, 36(2): 182-185.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
缪鸿石, 朱镛连. 脑卒中的康复评定和治疗[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 1996: 150.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
李林, 王强, 元相喜, 等. 姿势解密技术对脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2021, 43(9): 807-809.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
唐晓晓, 洪永锋, 毛晶, 等. 早期不同康复策略对脑卒中患者偏瘫侧上肢功能恢复的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(6): 779-783.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
钟琦, 刘云. 本体感觉训练方式在肩袖损伤修补术后康复中的研究进展[J]. 中国康复, 2020, 35(8): 433-436.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
This study tested the safety and ability of subjects with chronic hemiplegia to tolerate intensive training using a motorized cycle combined with functional electrical stimulation (FES) system.A case series of 10 subjects with chronic stroke participated in 30-minute three times per week cycling on a stationary motorized cycling system combined with FES (RT300(TM) ). The stimulation activated the dorsal and plantar flexors, the quadriceps and the hamstrings using four channels and a stimulation pattern that assisted cycling motion of the paretic lower limb. Patients were instructed to cycle as close as possible to 60 rpm and the resistance to cycling was gradually increased using a computer-based algorithm. The training lasted eight weeks.All 10 participants completed the training without adverse reactions to the training or the FES. The kcal utilized during the training increased significantly (p = 0.0003) between session 1 (2.2 ± 0.47), session 12 (4.3 ± 1.2) and session 24 (7.5 ± 1.8). Peak pedaling power increased from 6.5 ± 0.5 W pre-training to 18.0 ± 5.4 W post-training. Locomotion variables that improved significantly were time to complete the get up and go test (45.4 ± 54.9 seconds vs. 34.0 ± 31.8 seconds) a 24.6% improvement (p = 0.03) and gait velocity, which increased 25.0% from 0.4 ± 0.3 m/sec to 0.5 ± 0.4 m/sec (p = 0.01).Using a motorized cycle combined with FES intensive training appears safe and can be tolerated by patients with chronic stroke of wide age range, diverse severity of cardio-pulmonary deconditioning, motor loss and locomotor deficits.Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
乔志恒, 范维铭. 物理治疗学全书[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2001: 568.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
In people with stroke, range-of-motion (ROM) exercises may contribute to hemiparetic shoulder pain, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. This study examined scapular and humeral movement patterns in people with poststroke hemiparesis as they performed commonly prescribed ROM exercises.Using kinematic techniques, we studied 13 people with hemiparesis, both with and without pain, as they performed 3 commonly prescribed ROM exercises: person-assisted ROM, self-assisted ROM, and cane-assisted ROM. Their data were compared with those of a group of 12 matched control subjects performing scapular plane shoulder elevation, using mixed-model ANOVAs. Correlation analyses were used to examine the relationship between participants' ratings of pain and kinematic data.The hemiparetic group had mild pain at rest that increased during the performance of the exercises. During shoulder elevation, humeral external rotation in the hemiparetic group was decreased in all 3 ROM exercises compared with that in the control group. Scapular upward rotation in the hemiparetic group was decreased for the person-assisted ROM exercise only. No differences in scapular tilt were found between groups. The extent of movement abnormalities was not related to pain severity.People with hemiparesis had altered scapular and humeral movement patterns and increased shoulder pain when performing the ROM exercises. These data can assist clinicians in making decisions regarding which exercises to prescribe to preserve shoulder motion and prevent contractures in this population.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
李辉, 李岩, 顾旭东, 等. 减重平板训练联合功能性电刺激对脑卒中后偏瘫患者下肢运动功能和步行能力的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2022, 44(3): 214-217.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
The effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been investigated in chronic hemiplegia. The present study examines whether FES, given during acute stroke, was more effective in promoting motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability than standard rehabilitation alone.Forty-six subjects, 70.9+/-8.0 years old and 9.2+/-4.1 days after stroke, were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 groups receiving standard rehabilitation with FES or placebo stimulation or alone (control). FES was applied 30 minutes and placebo stimulation 60 minutes, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Outcome measurements included composite spasticity score, maximum isometric voluntary contraction of ankle dorsi-flexors and planter-flexors, and walking ability. They were recorded before treatment, weekly during the 3-week treatment, and at week 8 after stroke.No significant differences were found in the baseline measurements. After 3 weeks of treatment, there was a significant reduction in the percentage of composite spasticity score, and a significant improvement in the ankle dorsiflexion torque, accompanied by an increase in agonist electromyogram and a reduction in electromyogram cocontraction ratio in the FES group, when compared with the other 2 groups (P<0.05). All subjects in the FES group were able to walk after treatment, and 84.6% of them returned home, in comparison with the placebo (53.3%) and control (46.2%, P<0.05) groups.Fifteen sessions of FES, applied to subjects with acute stroke plus standard rehabilitation, improved their motor and walking ability to the degree that more subjects were able to return to home.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
中华医学会神经病学分会神经康复学组, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组, 卫生部脑卒中筛查与防治工程委员会办公室, 等. 中国脑卒中康复治疗指南(2011完全版)[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(4): 301-318.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
孙晓燕, 彭勇, 任大昌, 等. 偏瘫患者肩胛骨周围肌肉训练对预防肩关节半脱位的效果观察[J]. 福建医药杂志, 2020, 42(2): 107-109.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
张丽, 程海昉, 薛炘, 等. 脑卒中后肩关节半脱位的中西医康复进展[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2019, 28(4): 452-456.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |